Innovation, with both human sociality and individuality integrated, always faces a problem whether it is reasonable, that is, whether it reflects human autotelicity, and the integration of the scale of human and nature.
楼上字幕组的英语水平当然没话说,不过该改的还是要改。语文里的“相统一”应该不是简单的involve这么翻译把,我用integrate,带有集成的意思,不知道是否妥当? a problem,问题不是question,比如我们国家面临一个问题,这个问题应该是problem;a和the,我觉得用a。
以我经验,学术文章的翻译,动词一般都名词化,句末的统一,最好是名次,要么unification,要么integration,我选后者
LZ说的太绕了。。
应该这么断句:
是否合理/即/是否体现人的自成目的性 、 体现人的尺度与自然尺度
也就是说:合理是指“体现人的自成目的性 、 体现人的尺度与自然尺度”
于是最后润色一下,就是:
Innovation, an activity that involves both humansociality and individuality, always faces the question whether it is reasonable. That is, whether it shows human autotelicity and also unifies the the values of people and that of nature.
其实我想说,句子应该再断一断,要不太长看起来难受。
还有问题欢迎继续追问~
iSunnyStill, ACI中文字幕组
Innovation, as the activities with humansociality and individuality in unification/integrated, always faces the/a question whether itis reasonable, that is, whether it reflects human autotelicity and embodies the unification of the scale of people and that of nature.
Innovation as the unity of human sociality and individuality, whether there is always a reasonable whether it reflects its own purpose, embodies the unity of the people and nature of the scale of the scale problem. "
"Innovation as a social and individual human activities of the combination, there is always a is reasonable since become objective, embody human scale and the natural scale unity is embodiment of human."